REMIT II Reporting for Energy Trading  

REMIT reporting isn't failing - but the way most companies handle it is. 

As REMIT II expands reporting requirements, the pressure isn't just on submission. It's on the quality of data flowing through confirmation, settlement, and reconciliation.

Fidectus addresses this by improving the data behind regulatory reporting - not just the reporting itself. 

REMIT II is raising the bar

REMIT reporting isn’t getting easier.  With REMIT II, energy trading companies are dealing with more data, tighter controls, and far less tolerance for errors. And the real issue isn’t submission - it’s the data behind it.

Most reporting failures don’t happen at the point of reporting. They happen earlier, across confirmation, settlement, and reconciliation.

If that data isn’t aligned, validated, and complete, reporting breaks.

 

AdobeStock_1889243877

What is REMIT and why it matters

REMIT (Regulation on Wholesale Energy Market Integrity and Transparency) requires companies trading electricity or gas in Europe to report their trading activity to regulators.

It exists to prevent market abuse and ensure transparency across wholesale energy markets, with regulators like ACER monitoring reported data.

REMIT II expands these obligations - increasing both the volume of data and the expectations around accuracy.

energy trading

The growing challenge of regulatory reporting

For many organisations, regulatory reporting is not just about submitting data - it’s about ensuring that the data is correct in the first place.

Energy trading operations generate large volumes of data across multiple systems, including:

- Trade capture systems
- Confirmation processes
- Settlement platforms
- Financial and payment workflows.

When these systems are disconnected or rely on manual processes, errors can easily occur. These errors often surface during reporting, leading to rejected submissions, delays, and compliance risks.

What REMIT II changes for energy trading companies

REMIT II increases the scope and depth of reporting obligations. Energy trading companies must:

- Report more detailed transaction data
- Ensure higher levels of data accuracy
- Maintain clear audit trails
- Strengthen data validatoin processes
- Submit reports through a registered RRM to ACER.

As reporting requirements grow, manual processes become harder to manage and more prone to risk.

growing-reporting-challenge

Why data quality matters more than reporting tools

Many traditional REMIT solutions focus only on the final step: sending data to regulators. However, accurate reporting depends on the quality of data throughout the entire post-trade lifecycle.

If trade confirmations are inconsistent, settlements are incorrect, or reconciliation processes are incomplete, reporting outputs will reflect those issues. This is why improving data quality upstream is critical for successful REMIT compliance.

Platforms like Fidectus address this by connecting reporting with post-trade workflows - ensuring that data is validated before it reaches regulators.

14-fidectus-supports-remit-reporting

One platform. Multiple post-trade workflows.

 

Learn how GEN supports automation across the full post-trade lifecycle - reducing manual effort, improving operational visibility, and simplifying collaboration with counterparties.

Confirmation Hub

Automate confirmation matching across all commodities and counterparties.

Settlement Hub

Accelerate settlement and netting while reducing operational risk.

Regulatory Reporting Hub

Simplify regulatory reporting workflows and stay compliant with REMIT (II) and EMIR. 

Explore the GEN platform

Automate post-trade operations across the energy trading lifecycle. 

Moving toward automated, connected workflows

To meet these challenges, many energy trading companies are shifting toward automation and system integration.

Instead of treating reporting as a standalone task, leading organisations are connecting reporting with core post-trade processes, including:

- Trade confirmation
- Settlement
- Financial reconciliation
- Payment reconciliation.

This approach helps ensure that data is validated and aligned before it reaches the reporting stage.

invoice-reconciliation-efficiency

Supporting the full post-trade lifecycle

REMIT reporting is only one part of a broader set of post-trade activities.

After a trade is executed, energy trading teams must manage:

- Confirmations between counterparties
- Settlement calculations
- Invoice processing
- Reconciliation of financial and payment data.

Errors introduced at any of these stages can impact downstream reporting.

Improving visibility across the full lifecycle helps teams identify and resolve issues earlier, reducing operational risk.

remit-ii-reporting

Improving efficiency in invoice and reconciliation processes

Invoice handling and reconciliation are critical components of energy trading operations.

Many organisations still rely on manual processes, which can slow down operations and introduce inconsistencies.

Modern approaches include:

- Electronic invoicing workflows
- Automated invoice matching and reconciliation
- OCR technology to extract invoice data
- Structured exception handling processes.

These improvements help reduce manual effort while increasing data accuracy.

15-learn-more

Strengthening data integrity and auditability

As regulatory scrutiny increases, energy trading companies must ensure that their data is both accurate and traceable.

This requires:

- Strong data validation controls 
- Clear audit trails
- Consistent data integrity checks
- Transparent workflow across systems and teams.

These capabilities not only support compliance but also make internal processes more reliable and easier to manage.

data-integrity-auditability

Moving toward automated, connected workflows

To meet these challenges, many energy trading companies are shifting toward automation and system integration.

Instead of treating reporting as a standalone task, leading organisations are connecting reporting with core post-trade processes, including:

- Trade confirmation
- Settlement
- Financial reconciliation
- Payment reconciliation.

This approach helps ensure that data is validated and aligned before it reaches the reporting stage.

invoice-reconciliation-efficiency

How Fidectus supports REMIT II reporting

Fidectus improves REMIT reporting by focusing on the data behind it - not just the submission.

Unlike traditional solutions that sit at the end of the process, Fidectus connects reporting with confirmation, settlement, invoicing, and reconciliation workflows across the full trade lifecycle.

This ensures that data is aligned and validated upstream, reducing errors, rejected submissions, and compliance risk.

Through its SaaS platform, Fidectus enables teams to:

- Automate REMIT reporting and submission
- Validate and reconcile data before reporting
- Maintain complete audit trails
- Reduce manual back-office workload.
- Integrate with ETRM systems and trading infrastructure.

Fidectus also supports broader post-trade operations, including:

- Trade confirmation and matching
- Settlement processes
- Financial and payment reconciliation
- Invoice processing and e-invoicing
- Complex transaction flows such as BATE.

By bringing these processes together, teams gain full visibility across counterparties and transactions, allowing issues to be resolved before they impact reporting.

platform-workflows
 

Learn More

Understanding REMIT II is the first step - improving your processes is the next.

If you’re looking to reduce reporting risk, improve data accuracy, and automate post-trade workflows, Fidectus can help.

→ Get in touch

→ Visit fidectus.com

 

04-operations-impact-cut-manual-processing